Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JS (MKTG)
JS (MKTG)
Infrastructure for marketing of perishables Primary grading/ collection centers - non existent Warehousing and cold storage - inadequate Cold chain - non existent Quality certification system - non existent Transportation for perishables - non existent Rural markets - complete lack of infrastructure Wholesale markets - in government control, lack modern facilities Private / direct markets - not permitted Post harvest losses: 25 to 30 % in perishables
2.5
RETAILER
Retail Markups
160 220
100
MILK
FISH
FRUITS &VEGETABLES
Terminal markets
Concept
Hub-and-Spoke Format:
Terminal Market (the hub) to be linked to number of collection centres (the spokes) production centres to allow easy access to farmers
Collection centres (Spokes) to be conveniently located at key Provide state of art facilities for
electronic auction, grading, washing and packing lines, processing and exports, banking etc.
Terminal Market
Banking Institution
Infrastructure:
Electronic Auction
Processor
Exporter
Direct Selling
Collection Centre
Infrastructure: Washing, grading, sorting, weighment, transport to TM Services: Collection & Aggregation of produce, Settlement of payment, advisory on inputs, prices, quality, multimodal transport
200 6
100 3
100 2.25
88 3
75 2
59 2
55 5.47
100 2.4
60
20
20
30
26
25
12
25
Peak throughput 3000 (MT/day) Cold Store 15000 Capacity (in MT)
1500
800
1000
800
1000
1500
800
5000
3000
5000
2550
2000
10000
2000
Total Cost of Project ( in Rs. Crore) Debt Equity Ratio Debt Service Coverage Ratio Pay Back Period ( years) Break Even Point( %) Cash Break Even Point(%) IRR ( % )
11
Provide envisaged infrastructure at the TM and the CC in the hub- and- spoke format Establish backward linkage with growers in the catchment area of the TM through establishing the collection centers. Progressively involve farmers and their organizations in the operation and management of the collection centers Facilitate direct supply to processing units, retail chains and exporters, in addition to auction facility via the collection centers and terminal market
12
Provide advisory services to farmers on inputs, prices, quality, multi modal transport and exports Project DPR only illustrative. Project should, however, be designed to handle the minimum quantity of peak throughput (MT/day) and yearly handling capacity as prescribed. Private enterprise at liberty to
Prepare own business model with regard to Size of market and Scale of operation Set up additional facilities to provide complimentary services (input supply, processing, consumer goods etc.) Collect user charges for the infrastructure and services provided
13
Establish collection centres in the catchment area of the TM Source material from farmers field directly in the
catchment area of the TM
Regulatory clearances:
Single license to operate in the entire State/adjoining States Single point levy & collection of market fee Autonomy in commercial operations of TM Clearance of land use for the TM/CCs Provision of Civic amenities (including drinking water, municipal waste disposal, police security, post office etc) Statutory clearance from
16
Play a pro-active role: Appointment of a Nodal Officer/Empowered Committee to facilitate securing regulatory compliance to remove difficulty in operation of the project Identification of land for the TM/CC Provision of Government land on long term lease, subject to availability and suitability Infrastructure support to TM/CC road connectivity, power and water supply etc. States free to participate in the equity of Project
Direct funding Land/infrastructure support
Support the project through participation in its equity capital Terms for financing:
Up to 49% of project equity, including contribution from State NHM/State will have the option to allocate its equity to farmers organisations actively participating in the business of the project
Private enterprise to be selected through an open, transparent competitive bidding process. Project to be awarded to bidder with the request for minimum Government equity participation.
17
Outlay in 2006-07
Approved outlay for NHM X Five Year Plan During 2006-07 Rs.2300 crore Rs.1000 crore
Outlay for Terminal Markets Participation in Equity Capital Rs.148.00 crore Project Development Assistance Rs. crore General Awareness & Publicity Rs. 1.00 crore 1.00
18
Parameter
Baseline status
Expected outcome Transparent auctions through electronic auction system Setting up of cold storage at each market ranging from 2000 to 15000 MT capacity Minimum of 20 collection centers nearer to the farmers field will be set up. The farmer will have alternative options to supply to the supply chains, processing, export of commodities etc. Farmer is provided with alternative option of taking his produce to terminal markets. Length of the chain of commission agents will substantially be reduced with an ideal situation of
Backwardforward linkages
poor
19
Risk Factors
Attractiveness to Private Enterprises Availability of Suitable Land Success in establishing backward linkages with farmers
20
Process so far
General Council of the NHM approved the concept on 14.12.05 Honble FM announced in the Budget Speech of 2006-07 for setting up of Terminal Markets with an outlay of Rs.150 crore National Conference on Terminal Markets held on 20.02.2006 discussed with States and Private Enterprises There is adequate enthusiasm among Private Enterprises on the proposal as seen in the responses to Expression of Interest
21
Way Forward
Approval of the proposal by October end Finalization of Bid Process/ Bid documents by NIAM Inviting the bids by States and selecting the private enterprise National Executive Committee of NHM approves & releases the equity Project Execution General Council of NHM monitors the progress
22
F&V #2 in the world 151 Mn T Fisheries Marine: 2.7 Mn T Inland : 3.1 Mn T Food Grains #2 in the world (220 Mn T) Sugarcane # 2 in the world (245 Mn T) Tea Largest Producer (0.85 Mn T) Goat & Sheep 182 million
24
Fruits
1 5%
2.1 % (1 -93) 991 (2001 -03) Vegetables 1 .7%
0%
5%
1 0%
1 5%
20%
Vegetables
53%
Fruits 0.5%
F ruits
63%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
1 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
1 00%
Analysis of existing export promotion measures for agri exports Inability to address the entire value chain Hence, the policy of Agri Export Zones announced on 31st March, 2001 under Exim Policy
Agri export Zone attempts to take a look at an identified produce/ product or a group or a group of produce/ products sourced from a geographically contiguous area with a view to comprehensively addressing all the issues relating to each stage of the entire value chain, from farm to the ultimate consumer
MARKET
IDENTIFICATION OF PRODUCT & QUALITY PARAMETERS INPUTS SEEDS, FERTILIZER, NUTRIENTS WATER, PESTICIDES, CRED IT
MARKETING
PRE HARVEST
POST HARVEST
HARVESTING
PARTNERSHIP
Utilise existing interventions in a coordinated manner to promote exports (Convergence) Partnership of farmers, processors, exporters, State Government agencies and Central Government agencies. Focus on important issues.
Excise, Custom, Sales Tax, Mandi Tax etc. rebate by central and State agencies : Schemes of APEDA, NHB, MFPI, MOA etc. : Reduction in interest on credit by banks : Manpower requirement for research & extension related activities : Amendment of regulations with regard to movement of goods, institutional arrangement for consistent supply of produce etc.
Tariff & Non tariff Related issues : Import of duties, product standards, pesticide residues, Codex, etc.
Preparation of proposal by the State Governments. Clearance by the Steering Committee chaired by Commerce Secretary. Signing of MoU between Central (APEDA) and State Govt. undertaking commitments Nodal Officers appointed Detailed action plan for each activity and monitoring by the inter departmental Coordination Committee. Notification by DGFT Advertisement by State Govt./Agencies inviting private investment DPR and the execution of the detailed action plan.
Conclusion
AEZs on a MAP
Monitoring System
A web based monitoring system has been evolved wherein Each activity as a part of detailed action plan is clearly defined ; The agency responsible for undertaking such activity is identified ; The time within which such activity has to be performed is clearly indicated. State governments have committed a nodal agency for the purpose of coordination and the progress is monitored at the level of Chief / Addl Chief Secretary.
34
SOME SUGGESTIONS
Restructuring of Project Monitoring System (Single Window Concept for disbursement) Blue Print Project Reports for attracting Investments Market Intelligence Reports Funding Mechanism to give liberty to state nodal agencies Income Tax Incentive Higher scale of Financial Assistance Direct Finance by NABARD on concessional terms Rebate on premium for crop insurance