Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Task 1 - Investigation Presentation SL-HL
Task 1 - Investigation Presentation SL-HL
Task 1 - Investigation Presentation SL-HL
INVESTIGATION
3/25/12
MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION
ambiguity
develops from an initial problem contains multi-solution paths,
that is, the potential to choose different courses of action from a range of options
3/25/12
MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION
What part of the syllabus does this assess? What prior knowledge is required to complete
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
3/25/12
Criterion A
MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION
NOTATION
Limit the use of computer/calculator notation , the use of ^, * , E09 , etc is inappropriate Avoid careless misuse of some terminology (e.g. equation instead of expression) Give proper attention to notation, approximation signs should be used where appropriate
Criterion B
COMMUNICATION
Begin with an introduction to the task Make the work easy to read and follow , the written presentation should flow smoothly Avoid the Question-and-Answer format Use comments and annotations accompanied the steps and results Label all graphs (particularly those which have been obtained from technology) Do not relegate tables to the appendix Do not make your work excessively long (12-15 pages max) Avoid repetition (do not abuse of cut-and paste technique) End the task with the conclusions
3/25/12
Criterion D
MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
Avoid quoting results from Internet sources but explore and investigate on your own Informal explanation with some mathematical basis must be presented Formal explanation is sufficient for C5, D4
Validate the general statement (including values from different number sets) Analise the scope and limitations of your general formula as well as the quality of the explanation offered Explain and critically interpret the model and the methods to adapt the model to new situations
Use graphs which truly enhance the presentation of the work Technology must be resourceful; extending the analytical approach and contributing significantly to the development of the task
3/25/12 graphs (or the number of them) do not guarantee good marks unless they are High-quality
Some highlights
MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION
sections as chapters
Concise, easy to understand data Clear calculations Tables logically presented with explanations
Explanation boxes
3/25/12
Lowlights
MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION
No visuals Data table not explained Explanations of graphs precede the graphs Poorly handwritten Only one mathematical operation All graphs put at end Separate sections Sources of Error,
3/25/12 Conclusion,
Some tips
MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION
Write a brief introduction rather than jumping Set a tone of readability Pretend that you are writing a chapter in a
textbook a cohesive piece of mathematical writing with graphs/tables within the context
3/25/12 Explain each step fully, remembering that
EXAMPLE OF A TASK (including teachers comments) [An introduction would be helpful here. Criterion B.]
3/25/12
3/25/12
3/25/12
[Please explain the significance of this table. Are the values exact? Criterion B.]
3/25/12
[Is this exact enough? Criterion B.] [On the y axis the label should be term value or tn. Criterion B.]
3/25/12
[You assume the Fibonacci sequence is known. A brief description of it would be a good [It would be clearer idea. Criterion B.] here one or two more steps explaining how you get to tn+1. Criterion B.]
3/25/12
3/25/12
[By not developing tn = 2 + 1/ tn+1 you have missed tn+1 = (2a + b)/a. There is some work missing here. Criterion B.]
3/25/12
[You have established a general statement and tested validity, but this is poorly communicated. Criterion B rather than criterion C applies.]
3/25/12
[You have not graphed other examples . Criterion [Are there E.] limitations on k? Where is the
3/25/12