Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 24

CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS

DENT 657

ANALYSIS UTILIZING THE CEPHALOMETRIC TRACING


1) Describe the subjects dento-facial morphology 2) Quantitative description of morphological deviations 3) Make diagnostic and treatment planing decisions 2) Evaluate change over time - treatment induced and growth process

Morphological Description
Skeletal

- horizontal and vertical Dental - horizontal and vertical Comparing individual subjects tracing to the ideal Reference sample
Cross-sectional Longitudinal - growth studies eg. Bolton-Brush, Ann Arbor and Burlington

Cephalometric Analyses
Downs Steiners Tweeds

McNamaras
OSU

Cephalometric Evaluation
Identification

of anatomic landmarks Landmarks: stable reference structures and maxillary and mandibular skeletal and dental Graphically relating the dento-facial elements to these reference structures Angular and or linear measurements

METHODS OF CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS


Two

basic approaches Metric approach - use of selected linear and angular measures Graphic approach - overlay of individuals tracing on a reference template and visual inspection of degree of variation

Metric Method - Use of selected


linear and angular measures

Graphic Method - Use of a


Composite Template

GOALS OF CEPHALOMETRIC ANLYSIS


Evaluating

relationships, both horizontal and vertical of 5 major functional components of the face: the cranial base; the maxilla; the mandible, the maxillary and mandibular dentoalveolus

REFERENCE LINES
Frankforts

Horizontal (porion to

orbitale) Sella - Nasion line True horizontal plane True vertical plane

Reference Lines

sella

nasion

porion

orbitale

SNA 82 2 deg NA TO FH 90 3 deg

SKELETAL HORIZONTAL MAXILLA

s
FH

SNB 80 2 deg N-PG TO FH 88 6 deg

SKELETAL HORIZONTAL MANDIBLE

s
FH

b Pg

ANB 2 2 deg

SKELETAL HORIZONTAL MAXILLA TO MANDIBLE

A
B

FH TO GOGN 22 5 deg

Y AXIS 59 6 deg
LFH 55% OF TFH

SKELETAL VERTICAL

S FH

GO

ME

GN

INTERINCISAL 130 5 deg

DENTAL - UPPER TO LOWER INCISOR

U1 TO FH 110 5 deg

U1 TO NA 22deg
U1 TO NA 4mm

DENTAL - MAXILLARY INCISOR

N
FH A

L1 TO NB 25deg L1 TO NB 4mm L1 TO GOGN 91 6deg

DENTAL - MANDIBULAR ANTERIOR

GO

GN

NASOLABIAL ANGLE 102 8 deg L.LIP TO E PLANE -2 2mm

SOFT TISSUE

Limitations of the Metric Method


Stable

reference structures are only relatively stable Validity of landmarks Error in landmark identification

Graphic Method
Template Changes

between 2 time points

Superimposition Method - on the


cranial base

Maxillary and mandibular superimposition

Limitations of Cephalometric Analysis


Individual

variability Ethnic variability Gender variability

You might also like