Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 1 - Presentation IE 632
Group 1 - Presentation IE 632
www.themegallery.com
IE 632 Spring 2012 Islam Ali Amina Lyazidi - Prashanth Natarajan Harshit Sodhani
LOGO
CONTENTS
Introduction Problem Statement Solution Procedure Implementation Results and Conclusions Directions for Future Work
INTRODUCTION
3
INTRODUCTION
Conflicts of interest among hospital personnel Inefficient hospital management High Costs (physician and hospital services, insurance coverage)
OUR APPROACH
Case scheduling depends on the operating practices followed in the unit thus bringing up the need for it to be customized *Peltokorpi, A. (2011), Health Care Management Science, 14, 370-382
5
PROBLEM STATEMENT
6
PROBLEM STATEMENT
We are concerned with finding an optimal schedule for elective surgery cases for a hospital. Definition
An elective surgery is a planned, non-emergency surgical procedure. It may be either medically required (e.g., cataract surgery), or optional (e.g., breast augmentation or implant) surgery
-Encyclopedia of Surgery, 2012
This problem is NP-hard; thus, an appropriate heuristic will be devised for solving it
8
MODEL
10
MODEL DESCRIPTION
Arrival Process:
Patients arrival follows a stochastic process 5 types of patients arrive, depending on the surgical case Processing times are assigned as follows:
Operation Type 1 Processing Time (In Hours) UNIF(1.2, 1.5)
2
3 4 5
11
FIFO (First in first out) LEPST (Longest Expected Processing with Setup Time) SEPST (Shortest Expected Processing with Setup Time)
12
Operating Room:
4 operating rooms can process any type of incoming patients The total time patients spend in the OR: Processing time + Set up time
13
A record of every patient leaving the OR is kept This record is used to sort the subsequent patients in the queue
Queuing types:
FIFO (First in first out) LEPST (Longest Expected Processing with Setup Time) SEPST (Shortest Expected Processing with Setup Time)
14
RESULTS
Jobs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Job Type
0.96274 0.98474 2.96102 3.11537 3.51307 5.08722 5.78787 6.52716 8.50156 15.0878 8.06548 1.45600 7.57896 2.29551 6.98716 7.44875 6.81239 1.71174 20.9368 7.09767
1 2 3 4
0.96302
7 5 6
9.02850 22.18576 31.47765
10 9
CONCLUSION
17
FUTURE WORK
Considering due dates and deadlines. Using weights to model jobs urgency. Including other resources (medical staff, equipment, etc...). Extending the model to be used in online scheduling. The model can be made to incorporate unexpected entries such as emergencies.
19
www.themegallery.com
IE 632 Spring 2012 Islam Ali Amina Lyazidi - Prashanth Natarajan Harshit Sodhani
LOGO