Ionic Contribution To The Self-Potential Signals Associated With

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Ionic contribution to the selfpotential signals associated with a redox front

A. Revil , F. Trolard , G. Bourri , J. Castermant , A. Jardani , C.A. Mendona


Presented by: Fathiya Al-Hadhrami

Agenda
Why they did the research ?(objective) What did they do?(method) What did they find?(observations) What dose it mean?(discussion of results) Who cares?(significant) Final message to take home(conclusion)

Objective
we consider the case of a sharp redox potential distribution generated in a water-saturated porous medium with no electron conductor present to bridge electron donors and acceptors in the system.

These experiments demonstrate that despite the absence of electron conductors, self-potential anomalies can be observed.
However, their magnitudes are much weaker than in the case of the geobattery associated with an abiotic electronic conductor.

Experimental setup

Sketch of the experimental setups, Experiment 1. In Phase 1,2 (A. Revil et al., 2009)

Experimental setup

Sketch of the experimental setups, Experiment 2. In Phase 1,2 (A. Revil et al., 2009)

Observations

Distribution of the self-potential at the top surface of the tank for Experiment 1 (Phase 2). (A. Revil et al., 2009)

Observations

Distribution of the corrected redox potential inside the tank, at a depth of 3 cm, 3 h after the DC power supply was shut down (left) Distribution of the corrected redox potential across a profile in the tank (along y at x=25 cm)(right)(A. Revil et al., 2009)

Observations

Variation of the self-potential signals with depth and time with respect to the reference electrode. a. Self-potential signals versus depth 3 h after the DC power supply was shut down. These profiles are shown at 5 distinct locations in the tank . b. Self-potential signals versus time at 1 cm from the working and auxiliary electrodes(A. Revil et al., 2009)

Observations

Distribution of the redox potential, self-potential, and pH along two profiles in Experiment 2. (A. Revil et al., 2009)

Observations

Map of the self-potential (SP) at different time intervals during Phase 1,2 experiment 2 (A. Revil et al., 2009)

Observations

Map of the self-potential (SP) at different time intervals during Phase 1(A. Revil et al., 2009)

Observations

Map of the self-potential (SP) at different time intervals during Phase 1(A. Revil et al., 2009)

Discussion of the observations


Description of phase 1:

Discussion of the observations


Description of phase 1: There were 3 transport processes:
Operation Equations Comments

Electro-migration

(OH)=20.6108 m2 s1 V1, e1.6 h. <(6 days) very effective in Phase 1.


for QV=0.77 C m3 , h=20.6 h< 6 days so effective in phase 1 Less effective than Electro-migration L=6 cm and D=2109 m2 s1, d= 21 days very long ,The least significant process.

Electro-osmosis

Diffusion

Observations

Evolution of the pH and the redox potential at the cathode and at the anode as a function of time(Experiment 2, Phase 1, total duration of Phase 1:6 days). 1(A. Revil et al., 2009)

Discussion of the observations


Description of phase 2:

Discussion of the observations

Tomography of the self-potential signals 3 h after the DC power supply was shut down. Created by Jardani et al. (2007, 2008) (A. Revil et al., 2009)

Conclusion
in the presence of a sharp redox potential gradient only modest self-potential signals are generated in a porous material in the absence of an electronic conductor.

despite their small magnitudes, the diffusion potentials observed in the experiments were measurable and can be easily observed .
An assumption that a possibly biotic electronic conductor should be presented to explain the high values of SP anomalies in contaminated landfill was presented.

You might also like