Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Content Analysis Part 2
Content Analysis Part 2
Computer
programs have some time been boomed to quantitative research, allowing researchers to calculate quite rapidly very complex statistics. Programs to assist qualitative researchers in their analysis, however, now also exist. Many simple word processing programs can be used for some kinds of data analysis.
The
find command, for example, can locate various passages in a document that contain key words or phrases. Thus, a researcher might ask the computer to search for all passages that contain key words creative or nonconformist or punishment or artistic creativity.
The
notable examples of qualitative computer programs that are currently available include atlas .ti, QSR NUD*IST, Nvivo and Hyperresearch. These programs will identify words, phrases, or sentences, tabulate their occurrence, print and graph the tabulations and sort and regroup words, phrases or sentences according to how they fit a particular set of categories.
2. As we illustrated, it is extremely useful as a means of analyzing interview and observational data. 3. The researcher can delve into records and documents to get some feel for the social life of an earlier time. He or she is not limited by time and space to the study of present events.
4. A fourth advantage accrues from the fact that the logistics of content analysis are often relatively simple or economical-with regard to both time and resources-as compared to other research methods. This particularly true if the information is readily accessible, as in newspapers, reports, books, periodicals, and the like.
5. Lastly, and because the data are readily available and almost always ca be returned to if necessary or desired, content analysis permits replication of a study by other researchers. Even live television programs can be videotaped for repeated analysis at later times.
1. Limited to recorded information. 2. Establishing validity. Assuming that different analysts can achieve acceptable agreement in categorizing, the question remains as to the true meaning of the categories themselves.
1. Abstract
Respondents Justification Purpose 2. METHOD -Participant -Data Collection (justification) -Data Analyses - emergent codes
identified the paragraphs that adds clarity and those with good agreement 3. RESULTS Discipline Problems -Emergent definition Effective and Ineffective Strategies - Identified the effective and ineffective strategies (more definitions) 4. DISCUSSION - discussed the findings emerged from the study -marked particular part to emphasize the clarity 5. CONCLUSION - Identified whether good or unclear
PURPOSE /JUSTIFICATION
Purpose of the study Way of justification Citing several references
DEFINITIONS
Described how definition of terms helped in making the analysis clear or unclear Identify whether the references are pertinent. Examined whether there is statement of hypotheses
PRIOR RESEARCH
HYPOTHESES
SAMPLE
Identified the sample and analyze whether they are accurate and chosen using correct sampling Made mention of description about sample
INTERNAL VALIDITY