- DocumentWhy Does Aggregate Earnings Growth Reflectuploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- DocumentED PSAK 3 (R10) Laporan Keuangan Interim.pdfuploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- Document25_Buku_Perencanaan_Keuangan.pdfuploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- DocumentThe Effects of a Legal Process on Management Ofuploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- DocumentRobust Methoduploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- DocumentNon-financial Factors in the Going-concern Opinionuploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- DocumentBias Daripenggunaan Model Dimbaruploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- Documentpsikotest.pdfuploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- DocumentConceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions.pdfuploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- Documentteori akuntansi dan akuntansi multiparadigma.pdfuploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- DocumentStandard setters contend that fair value accounting yields the most relevant measurement for financial instruments. We examine this claim by comparing the value relevance of banks’ financial statements under fair value accounting with that under current GAAP, which is largely based on historical costs. We find that the combined value relevance of book value of equity and income under fair value is less than that under GAAP. We also find that fair value income is less value-relevant than GAAP income because of the inclusion of transitory unrealized gains and losses in fair value income. More surprisingly, we find that book value of equity under fair value is not more valuerelevant than under GAAP, due both to divergence between exit value and value-in-use and to measurement error in fair value estimates. Overall, our results suggest that financial statements under fair value accounting provide less relevant information for bank valuation than financial statements under current GAAP.uploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx
- DocumentCollins 1979uploaded byAnonymous IhnJWRx